Skip to main content

In our final week, we'll cover:

How can you be analyzing results and reporting back all without leaving the platform?
  • Sitewide and Project Statistics
  • Individual Tool Results
    • Automatic analysis
    • Tagging
  • Exporting
  • Closing the Loop: content tools for sharing results
    • Customer examples
  • Certification Program Reflection

Options for exporting (for Form tool):

  • Summary tab:
    • Summary report PDF: see example export here
    • This report shows graphs of results, as well as word clouds from tagging and Featured Contributions for text-based questions.
    • **Next product update will:
      • Allow you to choose which questions are included in this exported report
      • Change the graphics based on any filtering you apply so you can not only see any variations in results based on different groupings, but get those varied graphs without having to export and make them yourself.

  • Data Tab:
    • Spreadsheet of raw data with individual responses across all questions: see example here
    • Filtering lets you filter responses before exporting so you don't have to do that in a spreadsheet.

  • Analysis Tab
    • This is the tab to review and analyze responses to text-based questions.
    • You can either look at all responses across all text-based questions in aggregate, or look at each question individually and export each as its own spreadsheet.
    • Exporting spreadsheet of individual responses to text-based questions: see example here.

See Form Results Overview open in new window
Social Map Reporting open in new window
Gather Tool Reporting open in new window
Visioner Results + Reporting open in new window
Fund It Reporting open in new window

Using Facts Tool

Share some of the key takeaways, specific statistics, or any action items following a public engagement phase.

Using Image Slider

Share graphics, word clouds, and other images with detailed captions to provide context.

Using Feature Grid to Report Back

Feature Grid is a great way to incorporate visuals as you communicate key takeaways and action items.

  • Which scenario was most preferred?

    Scenario C, the medium-density scenario focused on streetscape improvements was ranked as the most preferred by respondents.

  • Walkability as a priority

    Respondents identified walkability as the most important element of placemaking.

  • Expand Bike Infrastructure

    78% of survey respondents cited a lack of protected bike lanes in the corridor as a concern and want to see additional funding for bike infrastructure.

Using Gallery to Report Back

Including images, charts, etc. from engagement tools, with captions overlays so people can explore on their own.
Walkability and access to parks were ranked as the most important aspects of placemaking.
Respondents felt that there should be more funding allocated for placemaking initiatives.
Respondents felt Council was doing well on placemaking efforts, with the majority rating 4 and 5 (out of 5).

What about the Faces tool?!

The Faces tool has the ability to add images, different headings and context, as well as link text if necessary.

More Bike Infrastructure

The majority of respondents (83%) identified the need for expanded bike infrastructure in the corridor.

Council Performance

When asked to rank how well Council was doing on a scale of 1-5, respondents reported an average of 4.35, indicating a high level of approval.

Walkability as Highest Priority

When asked to rank the most important elements of placemaking, respondents said walkability was the highest priority.